People v. Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Douglas

135 A.D.3d 450, 21 N.Y.S.3d 892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 2016

Docket16578 484/99

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.3d 450 (People v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Douglas, 135 A.D.3d 450, 21 N.Y.S.3d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J.), rendered April 16, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 15 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J.), rendered April 16, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 15 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.3d 450, 21 N.Y.S.3d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-douglas-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack