People v. Douglas

2 A.D.3d 1057, 768 N.Y.S.2d 669, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13558
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Douglas. Read the opinion of the Court — 296 A.D.2d 656

Opinion

— Mercure, J.P

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 17, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to 1 to 3 years in prison. The plea was entered into in satisfaction of a superior court information charging him with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, a crime which he committed while awaiting sentencing on another charge, the facts of which are more fully set forth in People v Douglas (2 AD3d 1050 [2003] [decided herewith]). Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. We disagree. Defendant committed the crime in violation of the no-arrest condition of a prior plea bargain. Given these circumstances, as well as the fact that defendant agreed to the sentence challenged on this appeal as part of a plea bargain, we find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Samuel, 284 AD2d 654, 655 [2001]; People v Hicks, 265 AD2d 600, 601 [1999]).

Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Douglas, 2 A.D.3d 1057, 768 N.Y.S.2d 669, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 1057 (People v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Douglas
2 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Hicks
265 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Samuel
284 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)