People v. Douglas
181 A.D.2d 1028, 586 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Douglas. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 A.D.2d 1015 →
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and granting it all reasonable inferences, we conclude that it was sufficient to provide a valid line of reasoning to support defendant’s conviction of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Murad, J. — Offering False Instrument For Filing, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Douglas, 181 A.D.2d 1028, 586 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
181 A.D.2d 1028 (People v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)