People v. Douglas

11 A.D.2d 596, 200 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9956

This text of 11 A.D.2d 596 (People v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Douglas, 11 A.D.2d 596, 200 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

The appeal, which was submitted without oral argument, presents the issue of the constitutionality of section 1141 of the Penal Law, dealing with “obscene prints and articles”. The decision in Smith v. California (358 U. S. 926) is not discussed in the briefs. Oral argument of the appeal at the next term of this court is directed with permission to the parties to file supplemental briefs, appellant on or before July 1, 1960 and respondent on or before July 16, 1960, copies to be served upon the Attorney-General, who is invited to appear, file a brief and participate in the oral argument. (Executive Law, § 71.) Any person desiring to file a brief amicus curice may apply prior to September 1, 1960 for permission. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. California
358 U.S. 926 (Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.2d 596, 200 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-douglas-nyappdiv-1960.