People v. Doud

280 A.D.2d 955, 720 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3448
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion by failing [956]*956to grant him an adjournment to permit him to call a defense witness. “Defendant failed to demonstrate that [the] witness[] would provide testimony that was material and favorable to the defense” (People v Tillman, 261 AD2d 854, 855, lv denied 93 NY2d 980; see, People v Benson, 260 AD2d 864, 865, lv denied, 93 NY2d 966). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court failed to marshall the evidence in an even-handed manner (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Yates County Court, Falvey, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Doud, 280 A.D.2d 955, 720 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 955 (People v. Doud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BAXTER, NATHAN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Baxter
108 A.D.3d 1158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)