People v. Dotson

46 A.D.2d 690, 360 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3821
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 28, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Dotson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dotson, 46 A.D.2d 690, 360 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered Novem[691]*691her 28, 1973, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term not to exceed four years on the grand larceny count and a definite jail sentence of one year on the assault count, the sentences to run concurrently. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the grand larceny conviction to petit larceny and vacating the sentence thereon, and case remanded to the County Court, Suffolk County, for resentencing on the petit larceny conviction. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the third degree was based on an indictment which charged, inter alia, that he had stolen property from the person of the complainant. However, at the trial, the complainant testified that defendant had taken about $2 from her purse. Her testimony does not establish that defendant took money from her “person” and it does not in any way satisfy the elements of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree (see Penal Law, § 155.30). However, the trial evidence was legally sufficient to establish the crime of petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25). Petit larceny is a lesser included offense of grand larceny (People v. Molina, 8 A D 2d 930). Therefore, under the authority of GPL 470.15 (subd. 2, par. [a]), which permits this court to modify a judgment if the trial evidence is only legally sufficient to establish a defendant’s guilt of a lesser included offense, the judgment should be modified by reducing the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree to petit larceny. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cooper
2021 NY Slip Op 04259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Keller
168 Misc. 2d 693 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
People v. Carr
179 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Washington
155 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Asch
107 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Salters
75 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.2d 690, 360 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dotson-nyappdiv-1974.