People v. Doti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Doti

12 A.D.2d 923, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12474

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 923 (People v. Doti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Doti, 12 A.D.2d 923, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar' as to permit the appeals to be heard on the original records, without printing the same, except that certified copies of the informations shall be substituted in place of the original informations, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points upon the District Attorney of Bronx County and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original records, with this court on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeals to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar' as to permit the appeals to be heard on the original records, without printing the same, except that certified copies of the informations shall be substituted in place of the original informations, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points upon the District Attorney of Bronx County and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original records, with this court on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeals to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 923, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-doti-nyappdiv-1961.