People v. Dosti

11 A.D.3d 253, 782 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11834
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 12, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 253 (People v. Dosti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dosti, 11 A.D.3d 253, 782 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered January 8, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 years, 4 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence, including extensive medical proof concerning the victim’s injuries, established that defendant punched the victim into an unconscious state and proceeded to sexually abuse her while she was physically helpless (compare People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 383 [2000]).

The court’s rulings concerning the three expert witnesses whose testimony is challenged on appeal constituted proper exercises of discretion (see People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430 [1983]). In each instance, the expert was properly qualified and the content of the testimony was admissible. There was nothing speculative about the experts’ opinions, including their explanations for the presence or absence of various kinds of physical evidence.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Saxe and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ramirez
126 A.D.3d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Mendoza
49 A.D.3d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 253, 782 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dosti-nyappdiv-2004.