People v. Dorsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dorsch

166 A.D. 515, 32 N.Y. Crim. 504, 151 N.Y.S. 668, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D. 515 (People v. Dorsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dorsch, 166 A.D. 515, 32 N.Y. Crim. 504, 151 N.Y.S. 668, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We do not think that the acts complained of come within the provisions of section 1459 of the Consolidation Act (Laws of 1882, chap. 410), because they did not tend to a breach of the peace, and, therefore, the conviction of this defendant was not justified.

The judgment must be reversed and the defendant discharged.

Present — Ingraham, P., J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.

Judgment reversed and defendant discharged. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We do not think that the acts complained of come within the provisions of section 1459 of the Consolidation Act (Laws of 1882, chap. 410), because they did not tend to a breach of the peace, and, therefore, the conviction of this defendant was not justified.

The judgment must be reversed and the defendant discharged.

Present — Ingraham, P., J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.

Judgment reversed and defendant discharged. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D. 515, 32 N.Y. Crim. 504, 151 N.Y.S. 668, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dorsch-nyappdiv-1915.