People v. Dopson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dopson

191 A.D.2d 274, 595 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2409

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 274 (People v. Dopson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dopson, 191 A.D.2d 274, 595 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), rendered June 7, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of four counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two sets of concurrent terms of 3 Vi to 7 years, each set to run consecutively to the other, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of making all terms run concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), rendered June 7, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of four counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two sets of concurrent terms of 3 Vi to 7 years, each set to run consecutively to the other, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of making all terms run concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 274, 595 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dopson-nyappdiv-1993.