People v. Donovan
54 A.D.2d 1076, 388 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15046
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Donovan. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 A.D.2d 27 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: While we believe that the court should have permitted the proper testimony by the brother, failure to receive it was harmless in view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt revealed in this record. (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230.) (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court—rape first degree and other charges.) Present.—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Mahoney, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Donovan, 54 A.D.2d 1076, 388 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
54 A.D.2d 1076 (People v. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)