People v. Donohue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Donohue

216 A.D.2d 486, 628 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6427

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 486 (People v. Donohue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Donohue, 216 A.D.2d 486, 628 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), all rendered August 12, 1994, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 93-00746, burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 93-00747, and burglary in the second degree (two counts) under Indictment No. 93-01586, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), all rendered August 12, 1994, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 93-00746, burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 93-00747, and burglary in the second degree (two counts) under Indictment No. 93-01586, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 486, 628 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-donohue-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack