People v. Donnelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Donnelly

173 A.D. 713, 35 N.Y. Crim. 79, 159 N.Y.S. 690, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 A.D. 713 (People v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Donnelly, 173 A.D. 713, 35 N.Y. Crim. 79, 159 N.Y.S. 690, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomas, J.:

The appellant was convicted upon an information charging that he was unlawfully possessed of a quantity of heroin. A [714]*714police officer saw the defendant walking on Rockaway road, and approaching, asked him “where he was going,” and, as testified, “he put his hand in his pocket and dropped a small package in the street.” A chemist opened the package and “found a small package there of white powder, * * * analyzed the white powder and found it contained heroin hydrochloride.” The brief for the respondent refers the case to section 1746 of the Penal Law (as added by Laws of 1913, chap. 470), which regulates the sale of “Alkaloid cocaine or its salts, or alpha or beta eucaine or their salts, or any admixture, compound, solution or product of which cocaine or eucaine or their salts may be an ingredient.” The evidence does not indicate that heroin or heroin hydrochloride is an element of any of the substances enumerated. Hence, the section, so far as appears, is not applicable. So the judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions should be reversed, and as the information is laid under that section, it should be dismissed.

Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions reversed and information dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas, J.:

The appellant was convicted upon an information charging that he was unlawfully possessed of a quantity of heroin. A [714]*714police officer saw the defendant walking on Rockaway road, and approaching, asked him “where he was going,” and, as testified, “he put his hand in his pocket and dropped a small package in the street.” A chemist opened the package and “found a small package there of white powder, * * * analyzed the white powder and found it contained heroin hydrochloride.” The brief for the respondent refers the case to section 1746 of the Penal Law (as added by Laws of 1913, chap. 470), which regulates the sale of “Alkaloid cocaine or its salts, or alpha or beta eucaine or their salts, or any admixture, compound, solution or product of which cocaine or eucaine or their salts may be an ingredient.” The evidence does not indicate that heroin or heroin hydrochloride is an element of any of the substances enumerated. Hence, the section, so far as appears, is not applicable. So the judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions should be reversed, and as the information is laid under that section, it should be dismissed.

Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions reversed and information dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D. 713, 35 N.Y. Crim. 79, 159 N.Y.S. 690, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-donnelly-nyappdiv-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack