People v. Donaldson

66 A.D.3d 749, 886 N.Y.S.2d 369
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the [750]*750defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), dated June 17, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to show, by clear and convincing evidence, that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating him a level three sex offender (see People v Ainoris, 57 AD3d 864 [2008]; People v Bowens, 55 AD3d 809, 810 [2008]; People v Windham, 37 AD3d 571 [2007], affd 10 NY3d 801 [2008]; People v Morales, 33 AD3d 982, 983 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Donaldson, 66 A.D.3d 749, 886 N.Y.S.2d 369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

66 A.D.3d 749 (People v. Donaldson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Padro
84 A.D.3d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)