People v. Donah
This text of 127 A.D.3d 1413 (People v. Donah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.), rendered March 5, 2012 in Clinton County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree.
Defendant waived indictment and, in satisfaction of a superior court information, pleaded guilty to burglary in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. He thereafter was sentenced as a second felony offender to the agreed-upon prison term of 2 to 4 years. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contention, his waiver of the right to appeal is valid. Supreme Court distinguished the right to appeal from those rights automatically forfeited by defendant’s guilty plea, and defendant executed a written waiver in open court. Accordingly, defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Oginski, 123 AD3d 1303, 1303 [2014]; People v Dyckman, 114 AD3d 994, 995 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 1036 [2014]). Given defendant’s valid waiver of appeal, his challenge to the severity of the sentence is precluded (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Fate, 117 AD3d 1327, 1329 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1083 [2014]; People v White, 96 AD3d 1299, 1300 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 1029 [2012]).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D.3d 1413, 5 N.Y.S.3d 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-donah-nyappdiv-2015.