People v. Dominique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dominique

56 A.D.2d 571, 866 N.Y.S.2d 878

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 9, 2007 (People v Dominique, 36 AD3d 624 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 23, 2002.

[572]*572Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Lifson, Santucci and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 9, 2007 (People v Dominique, 36 AD3d 624 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 23, 2002.

[572]*572Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Lifson, Santucci and Covello, JJ., concur.

People v. Dominique, 56 A.D.2d 571, 866 N.Y.S.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

56 A.D.2d 571 (People v. Dominique) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related