People v. Doherty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Doherty

77 A.D.2d 701, 430 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 701 (People v. Doherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Doherty, 77 A.D.2d 701, 430 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered July 2, 1979, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree. The sole issue is whether or not the sentence imposed, at least two and one-third years and at most seven years, is excessive. The record discloses that the plea entered was in full satisfaction of an indictment charging two separate acts of robbery in the first degree. Considering the gravity of the offenses originally charged and the amelioration represented by the reduced charge, the sentence is not excessive. Judgment affirmed. Staley, Jr., J. P., Main, Mikoll, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered July 2, 1979, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree. The sole issue is whether or not the sentence imposed, at least two and one-third years and at most seven years, is excessive. The record discloses that the plea entered was in full satisfaction of an indictment charging two separate acts of robbery in the first degree. Considering the gravity of the offenses originally charged and the amelioration represented by the reduced charge, the sentence is not excessive. Judgment affirmed. Staley, Jr., J. P., Main, Mikoll, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 701, 430 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-doherty-nyappdiv-1980.