People v. Doe

Nassau County District Court

People v. Doe

52 Misc. 2d 656, 276 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1846

DecidedJanuary 19, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 52 Misc. 2d 656 (People v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nassau County District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Doe, 52 Misc. 2d 656, 276 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1846 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

B. Thomas Pantaho, J.

Application is made pursuant to the provisions of article 23 of the Correction Law for a certificate of relief from disabilities arising from an adjudication of the defendant as a youthful offender on July 29, 1953.

Article 23 is designed to relieve a person who has been convicted of a crime or of an offense on only one occasion from dis[657]*657abilities which flow as a result of that conviction. An adjudication as a youthful offender is not deemed to be a conviction nor does it operate as a disqualification to hold public office, public employment or as a forfeiture of any right or privilege or to receive any license granted by public authority (Code Crim. Pro., § 913-n).

It appears, therefore, that article 23' is not applicable in connection with adjudications as youthful offender and, indeed, is not required. The within application is, therefore, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B. Thomas Pantaho, J.

Application is made pursuant to the provisions of article 23 of the Correction Law for a certificate of relief from disabilities arising from an adjudication of the defendant as a youthful offender on July 29, 1953.

Article 23 is designed to relieve a person who has been convicted of a crime or of an offense on only one occasion from dis[657]*657abilities which flow as a result of that conviction. An adjudication as a youthful offender is not deemed to be a conviction nor does it operate as a disqualification to hold public office, public employment or as a forfeiture of any right or privilege or to receive any license granted by public authority (Code Crim. Pro., § 913-n).

It appears, therefore, that article 23' is not applicable in connection with adjudications as youthful offender and, indeed, is not required. The within application is, therefore, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Misc. 2d 656, 276 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-doe-nydistctnassau-1967.