People v. Dodson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dodson

48 A.D.2d 676, 371 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 676 (People v. Dodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dodson, 48 A.D.2d 676, 371 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant to reargue, with respect to the sentences only, his appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 6, 1973. On July 29, 1974 this court modified the judgment by reducing the sentence upon the conviction for criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the second degree to a minimum of five years and a maximum of 15 years on the first count, and by permitting the other sentences to remain and run concurrently with said sentence. Motion for reargument granted, upon the consent of the People, and, upon reargument, the sentences are vacated and the case is remanded to Criminal Term for resentencing. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to reargue, with respect to the sentences only, his appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 6, 1973. On July 29, 1974 this court modified the judgment by reducing the sentence upon the conviction for criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the second degree to a minimum of five years and a maximum of 15 years on the first count, and by permitting the other sentences to remain and run concurrently with said sentence. Motion for reargument granted, upon the consent of the People, and, upon reargument, the sentences are vacated and the case is remanded to Criminal Term for resentencing. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 676, 371 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dodson-nyappdiv-1975.