People v. Dodson

196 N.W.2d 29, 38 Mich. App. 268
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 28, 1972
DocketDocket No. 11999
StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.W.2d 29 (People v. Dodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dodson, 196 N.W.2d 29, 38 Mich. App. 268 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Michael Lee Dodson was convicted by a jury of assault with intent to commit rape, MCLA 750.85; MSA 28.280. He appeals as of right.

Defendant argues that his conviction should be reversed because of the admission into evidence at trial of ten alleged hearsay statements. Of these only one was preserved for appeal by objection below. Notwithstanding, we have considered defendant’s contentions, and conclude that they do not require reversal on the totality of the record in this case. We fail to find any prejudice to defendant resulting from admission of the statements challenged on appeal. See People v Grimmett, 29 Mich App 609, 612 (1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Grimmett
185 N.W.2d 829 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.W.2d 29, 38 Mich. App. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dodson-michctapp-1972.