People v. Docen-Perez

197 A.D.2d 865, 603 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9249
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 865 (People v. Docen-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Docen-Perez, 197 A.D.2d 865, 603 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendants’ convictions must be reversed because the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt unconstitutionally diminished the People’s burden of proof and defendants thereby were deprived of a fair trial (see, People v Brinson, 195 AD2d 966; People v Towndrow, 187 AD2d 194, lv dismissed 81 NY2d 1021; see also, Sullivan v Louisiana, 508 US —, 113 S Ct 2078). We find no other reversible error in the issues raised by defendants. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LUGO-ROSADO, ORLANDO, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Lugo-Rosado
83 A.D.3d 1529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Contrearas
197 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 865, 603 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-docen-perez-nyappdiv-1993.