People v. Dobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dobson

124 A.D.2d 744, 508 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62044

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1986·Published

Opinion

The defendant never moved to suppress his confession as illegally obtained prior to knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entering a plea of guilty to assault in the first degree. Consequently, his guilty plea precludes judicial review of this issue (see, People v Nicholson, 11 NY2d 1067; People v Thomas, 74 AD2d 317, 321, affd 53 NY2d 338; People v Blim, 61 AD2d 876, 877; People v Rivera, 50 AD2d 805). A review of the record on appeal and the plea bargain negotiated by defense counsel belies the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant never moved to suppress his confession as illegally obtained prior to knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entering a plea of guilty to assault in the first degree. Consequently, his guilty plea precludes judicial review of this issue (see, People v Nicholson, 11 NY2d 1067; People v Thomas, 74 AD2d 317, 321, affd 53 NY2d 338; People v Blim, 61 AD2d 876, 877; People v Rivera, 50 AD2d 805). A review of the record on appeal and the plea bargain negotiated by defense counsel belies the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

People v. Dobson, 124 A.D.2d 744, 508 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

124 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Dobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related