People v. Dobbs
This text of 134 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Dobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record at the suppression hearing supports the court’s finding that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant without the necessity of a warrant. Thus, defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied (CPL 140.10 [1] [b]; People v Lombardi, 18 AD2d 177, affd 13 NY2d 1014).
We find no merit to defendant’s contention that the pretrial identification procedure was unduly suggestive (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1024; People v Brnja, 50 NY2d 366, 372; People v Smith, 38 NY2d 882; People v Blake, 35 NY2d 331, 336-337; People v Smith, 109 AD2d 1096, 1097-1098; People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 627). From our review of the record, the evidence, although circumstantial, was legally sufficient to convict defendant of all charges. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — burglary, third degree, and other offenses.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.2d 924, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dobbs-nyappdiv-1987.