People v. Dixon

115 A.D.2d 275, 496 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54536
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The information furnished to the police by an identified citizen gave rise at least to a reasonable suspicion that defendant was armed and involved in criminal activity, authorizing a frisk for weapons (CPL 140.50 [3]) encompassing a limited search of her handbag (People v Moore, 32 NY2d 67, cert denied 414 US 1011). The District Attorney was not disqualified from prosecuting the indictment merely because defendant was a complainant in an unrelated felony prosecution pending in the Monroe County District Attorney’s office. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Pine, J.—criminal possession of weapon, third degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dixon, 115 A.D.2d 275, 496 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

115 A.D.2d 275 (People v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Relin v. Celli
134 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)