People v. Dix
This text of 110 A.D.2d 905 (People v. Dix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[906]*906Although much of the evidence was circumstantial, it was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, on two separate occasions, knowingly possessed stolen property. Therefore, the verdict must stand (People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 204). Defendant’s contention that the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive must be rejected since, as a second felony offender, he received the minimum sentence available under the law (see, Penal Law §§ 70.06, 165.50). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 905, 488 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dix-nyappdiv-1985.