People v. Dix
110 A.D.2d 905, 488 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48810
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[906]*906Although much of the evidence was circumstantial, it was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, on two separate occasions, knowingly possessed stolen property. Therefore, the verdict must stand (People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 204). Defendant’s contention that the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive must be rejected since, as a second felony offender, he received the minimum sentence available under the law (see, Penal Law §§ 70.06, 165.50). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Dix, 110 A.D.2d 905, 488 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 905 (People v. Dix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Valderrama
140 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)