People v. Diorio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Diorio

55 A.D.2d 682, 390 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 682 (People v. Diorio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Diorio, 55 A.D.2d 682, 390 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 15, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), attempted murder, assault in the first degree (two counts) and possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. On this record the clear and convincing testimony of the victim provided overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt. Further, no exceptions were taken to the matters now sought to be reviewed and the interest of justice does not warrant interference with the judgment of conviction. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 15, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), attempted murder, assault in the first degree (two counts) and possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. On this record the clear and convincing testimony of the victim provided overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt. Further, no exceptions were taken to the matters now sought to be reviewed and the interest of justice does not warrant interference with the judgment of conviction. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 682, 390 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-diorio-nyappdiv-1976.