People v. Dinkins

174 N.Y.S.3d 859, 2022 NY Slip Op 05540

Opinion

People v Dinkins (2022 NY Slip Op 05540)

People v Dinkins

2022 NY Slip Op 05540

Decided on October 5, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 5, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2019-09520
2019-09522

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shaquill Dinkins, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 2717/18, 294/19)

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (John G. Ingram, J.), both rendered June 14, 2019, convicting him of petit larceny under Indictment No. 2717/18, and robbery in the third degree under Indictment No. 294/19, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 260-261; People v Paige, 54 AD3d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, CHRISTOPHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court