People v. Dingle

79 A.D.3d 834, 912 N.Y.S.2d 421
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), dated June 30, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances warranting a downward departure from his presumptive level three risk assessment (see People v Colavito, 73 AD3d 1004, 1005 [2010]; People v Bowens, 55 AD3d 809, 810 [2008]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating the defendant a level three sex offender. Skelos, J.P., Eng, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dingle, 79 A.D.3d 834, 912 N.Y.S.2d 421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

79 A.D.3d 834 (People v. Dingle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vevgas
83 A.D.3d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)