People v. Dimon
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3272 (People v. Dimon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Dimon |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 03272 |
| Decided on May 4, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 4, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
502 KA 16-00920
v
CHARLES DIMON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (SARA A. GOLDFARB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (James H. Cecile, A.J.), rendered January 6, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence imposed to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years and as modified the judgment is affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law
§ 140.20). Preliminarily, we agree with defendant that he did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Elioff, 152 AD3d 1158, 1159 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1126 [2017]; People v Homer, 151 AD3d 1949, 1949 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 950 [2017]). We further agree with defendant that the 2-to-6-year term of imprisonment imposed by County Court is unduly harsh and severe, and we therefore modify the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence to a term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years (see generally People v Meacham, 151 AD3d 1666, 1670 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 981 [2017]).
Entered: May 4, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 3272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dimon-nyappdiv-2018.