People v. Dillon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dillon

55 A.D.2d 780, 389 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 780 (People v. Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dillon, 55 A.D.2d 780, 389 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Che-mung County, rendered September 26, 1975, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was sentenced to a period of imprisonment with a minimum term of one year and a maximum of life. On this appeal he contends the sentence was harsh and excessive since lifetime probation should have been imposed as an alternative owing to his material assistance in the investigation and apprehension of other drug offenders (Penal Law, § 65.00, subd 1, par [b]). We have examined the question and find no merit in his arguments (People v Eason, 40 NY2d 297). Judgment affirmed. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Che-mung County, rendered September 26, 1975, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was sentenced to a period of imprisonment with a minimum term of one year and a maximum of life. On this appeal he contends the sentence was harsh and excessive since lifetime probation should have been imposed as an alternative owing to his material assistance in the investigation and apprehension of other drug offenders (Penal Law, § 65.00, subd 1, par [b]). We have examined the question and find no merit in his arguments (People v Eason, 40 NY2d 297). Judgment affirmed. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 780, 389 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dillon-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack