People v. Dikshteyn
This text of 77 A.D.3d 851 (People v. Dikshteyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Henry, J.), rendered January 4, 2008, convicting him of attempted criminal contempt in the second degree and harassment in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to present a defense as a result of the Supreme Court’s refusal to grant him a further adjournment to secure the continued testimony of a witness. Any evidence that the defendant could have elicited from that witness would have been cumulative of evidence already elicited from three other defense witnesses (see People v Jackson, 41 AD3d 498, 499 [2007]; People v Mertens, 97 AD2d 595, 596 [1983]). Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 A.D.3d 851, 908 N.Y.S.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dikshteyn-nyappdiv-2010.