People v. Diggs

2017 NY Slip Op 6658, 153 A.D.3d 1428, 60 N.Y.S.3d 697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2017·No. 2015-12135·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated October 15, 2015, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is denied.

A police officer who saw the defendant commit two suspected violations was justified in pursuing the defendant once he fled from the officer (see People v Morris, 138 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2016]; People v Basono, 122 AD3d 553, 553 [2014]; People v Coba, 78 AD3d 857, 858 [2010]; People v Canty, 55 AD3d 330, 330-331 [2008]; People v Simms, 25 AD3d 425 [2006]; People v Delgado, 4 AD3d 310, 310-311 [2004]). Since the pursuit of the defendant was justified, a handgun found where the defendant fell to the ground was not subject to suppression as the product of unlawful police conduct. The County Court therefore erred in granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Rivera, J.R, Lev-enthal, Hall and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diggs, 2017 NY Slip Op 6658, 153 A.D.3d 1428, 60 N.Y.S.3d 697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 6658 (People v. Diggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Zachary
2020 NY Slip Op 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)