People v. Diggs
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6658 (People v. Diggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated October 15, 2015, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is denied.
A police officer who saw the defendant commit two suspected violations was justified in pursuing the defendant once he fled from the officer (see People v Morris, 138 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2016]; People v Basono, 122 AD3d 553, 553 [2014]; People v Coba, 78 AD3d 857, 858 [2010]; People v Canty, 55 AD3d 330, 330-331 [2008]; People v Simms, 25 AD3d 425 [2006]; People v Delgado, 4 AD3d 310, 310-311 [2004]). Since the pursuit of the defendant was justified, a handgun found where the defendant fell to the ground was not subject to suppression as the product of unlawful police conduct. The County Court therefore erred in granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 6658, 153 A.D.3d 1428, 60 N.Y.S.3d 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-diggs-nyappdiv-2017.