People v. Dickson
46 Cal. 53
Opinion
The bill of exceptions which the prisoner desires the Court below to certify, is not contained in the record nor shown to us upon this application for a writ of mandamus against the Judge. In its absence we are unable to determine whether it would, if settled and signed, tend to manifest any error committed at the trial. (People v. Lee, 14 Cal. 510; People v. Kohl, 18 Cal. 432.)
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Dickson, 46 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1873).
46 Cal. 53 (People v. Dickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Derr v. Busick
218 P. 280 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
People v. Salmon
83 P. 42 (California Supreme Court, 1905)
Gay v. Torrance
78 P. 540 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Schmidt v. Schmidt
1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 177 (Van Wert County Court of Common Pleas, 1903)
Brevaldo v. State
21 Fla. 789 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1886)