People v. Dicks

266 A.D.2d 106, 698 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11658
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dicks. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 A.D.2d 517

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered October 17, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel. None of the alleged errors by counsel could have deprived defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714). We note that counsel’s failure to advise defendant of the impending expiration of a plea offer that was previously rejected by defendant did,not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel since the court was under no obligation to hold open a rejected plea offer (see, People v Johnson, 181 AD2d 832, lv denied 80 NY2d 833). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dicks, 266 A.D.2d 106, 698 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 106 (People v. Dicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Johnson
181 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)