People v. Dickerson

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Dickerson

163 N.W.2d 795, 13 Mich. App. 267, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1055

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 1968·No. Docket No. 4,657·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Purnell Dickerson was tried without a jury and convicted of robbery armed.* On appeal it is contended that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

We have examined the record and we have discovered no reversible error. The question presented here on appeal is unsubstantial and requires no formal argument or submission.

Affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and T. G. Kavanagh and Quinn, JJ., concurred.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant Purnell Dickerson was tried without a jury and convicted of robbery armed.* On appeal it is contended that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

We have examined the record and we have discovered no reversible error. The question presented here on appeal is unsubstantial and requires no formal argument or submission.

Affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and T. G. Kavanagh and Quinn, JJ., concurred.

Footnotes

People v. Dickerson, 163 N.W.2d 795, 13 Mich. App. 267, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1055 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

163 N.W.2d 795 (People v. Dickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.