People v. Dickens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dickens

157 A.D.2d 548, 551 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D.2d 548 (People v. Dickens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dickens, 157 A.D.2d 548, 551 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 2, 1987, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of six years to life imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

In contention with the appeal of codefendant Richard Deas, this court has previously considered and rejected the argument that the police officers’ testimony at the suppression hearing was incredible as a matter of law (see, People v Deas, 156 AD2d 140).

We find defendant’s excessive sentence claim to be without merit. Concur Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 2, 1987, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of six years to life imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

In contention with the appeal of codefendant Richard Deas, this court has previously considered and rejected the argument that the police officers’ testimony at the suppression hearing was incredible as a matter of law (see, People v Deas, 156 AD2d 140).

We find defendant’s excessive sentence claim to be without merit. Concur Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D.2d 548, 551 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dickens-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack