People v. Dickens
This text of 673 N.E.2d 1237 (People v. Dickens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the [1033]*1033lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court’s review.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 N.E.2d 1237, 88 N.Y.2d 1031, 651 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dickens-ny-1996.