People v. Dickens
673 N.E.2d 1237, 88 N.Y.2d 1031, 651 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3054
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the [1033]*1033lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court’s review.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Dickens, 673 N.E.2d 1237, 88 N.Y.2d 1031, 651 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3054 (N.Y. 1996).
673 N.E.2d 1237 (People v. Dickens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Cooper
48 A.D.3d 1055 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Moya
35 A.D.3d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Redden
27 A.D.3d 1173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Pinkard
306 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Johnson
298 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Jackson
279 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Otero
256 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Brown
246 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Williams
240 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Monahan
237 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Huntley
237 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)