People v. DiCambio

New York Court of Appeals

People v. DiCambio

234 N.E.2d 713, 21 N.Y.2d 728, 287 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1682

DecidedJanuary 10, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 234 N.E.2d 713 (People v. DiCambio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DiCambio, 234 N.E.2d 713, 21 N.Y.2d 728, 287 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1682 (N.Y. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for amendment of remittitur denied. Defendant on his appeal to this court urged only that the means used by the People, in proving fingerprints found on an object taken from the burglarized premises were his, was unnecessarily prejudicial. No claim was made that defendant’s rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated. The only possible Federal constitutional issue alluded to in defendant’s brief in this court suggested a general due process claim in connection with the police officer’s prominent display of his badge while testifying to the taking of defendant’s fingerprints on the trial. [See 17 N Y 2d 556.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for amendment of remittitur denied. Defendant on his appeal to this court urged only that the means used by the People, in proving fingerprints found on an object taken from the burglarized premises were his, was unnecessarily prejudicial. No claim was made that defendant’s rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated. The only possible Federal constitutional issue alluded to in defendant’s brief in this court suggested a general due process claim in connection with the police officer’s prominent display of his badge while testifying to the taking of defendant’s fingerprints on the trial. [See 17 N Y 2d 556.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 N.E.2d 713, 21 N.Y.2d 728, 287 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dicambio-ny-1968.