People v. Dibble
This text of 135 A.D.2d 1075 (People v. Dibble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The crime of larceny by false pretenses, one of four forms of larceny found at common law, is defined in Penal Law § 155.05 (2) (a). Such a larceny occurs where the defendant obtains title or possession of money or personal property from the victim by means of a false representation concerning a material matter of fact upon which the victim relied in parting with the property or delivering possession (see, People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359, 362; People v Churchill, 47 NY2d 151; People v Miller, 169 NY 339, 351). The false representation "must relate to a past or present fact, not a statement of future intention” (People v Churchill, supra, at 156).
Here, the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally sufficient to establish that defendants wrongfully obtained the property of another by false pretenses. The proof demonstrates that defendants falsely represented the validity of a worthless letter of credit which they provided to NEC Home Electronics (NEC) in order to induce NEC to deliver a shipment of computer hardware and that the shipment was made by NEC in reliance upon the validity of said letter of credit. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — dismiss indictment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.2d 1075, 523 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dibble-nyappdiv-1987.