People v. Diaz

294 A.D.2d 225, 741 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered August 30, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s requests to proceed pro se at trial. Defendant engaged in seriously disruptive behavior (see, People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d 10, 17), which was documented by the court on the record. In addition to interruptions made in its presence, the trial court had learned that defendant’s behavior at a hearing before another justice had been so disruptive that it provided support for a severance motion by a codefendant. Furthermore, defendant’s requests to represent himself were equivocal. As the record makes clear, defendant was seeking hybrid representation to which he was [226]*226not entitled (see, People v Mirenda, 57 NY2d 261, 265-266; People v Garcia, 69 NY2d 903). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Wallach and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 294 A.D.2d 225, 741 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 225 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
165 N.Y.S.3d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Douce (Oliver)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019