People v. Diaz

254 A.D.2d 367, 678 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10745
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 749

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), imposed February 1, 1996, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant validly waived his right to appeal as part of the negotiated plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, his contention that the sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v Lucas, 243 AD2d 731; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 254 A.D.2d 367, 678 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 367 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Lucas
243 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)