People v. Diaz

199 A.D.2d 182, 605 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12056
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira F. Beal, J.), rendered March 22, [183]*1831991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of one count of attempted murder in the second degree and one count of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 7 to 21 years and 3 to 9 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

On this record, it is apparent that defense counsel was faced with the ethical dilemma which arises when counsel learns during trial that his client intends to commit perjury. It is also apparent that counsel’s actions in discharging his ethical responsibilities (Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7-102 [A] [4] [22 NYCRR 1200.33 (a) (4)]) did not deny his client the effective assistance of counsel.

The trial court’s Sandoval ruling, if error, was harmless, given the overwhelming evidence of guilt (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 199 A.D.2d 182, 605 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 182 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maisonette
234 A.D.2d 27 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Reed
222 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)