People v. Diaz

179 A.D.2d 674
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s claim that the trial court unfairly marshalled the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v West, 56 NY2d 662). In any event, upon reviewing the record, we find that the trial court’s marshalling of the evidence did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Saunders, 64 NY2d 665; People v Culhane, 45 NY2d 757, cert denied 439 US 1047; see also, People v Gray, 144 AD2d 483; People v McDonald, 144 AD2d 701).

We also find that the court properly denied the defendant’s request for a missing witness charge (People v Kitching, 78 NY2d 532; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424; People v Aufiero, 139 AD2d 656). Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 179 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 674 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Melvin
188 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)