People v. Diaz

123 A.D.2d 713, 507 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), rendered August 25, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), and robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that a prearrest photographic identification by an eyewitness was improper simply because a physical lineup, the preferred procedure, was not employed (see, People v Garcia, 115 AD2d [714]*714617). The record does not establish that the photographic identification procedure utilized was in any way suggestive.

We have reviewed defendant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 123 A.D.2d 713, 507 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

123 A.D.2d 713 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Christopher E.
163 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)