People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Diaz

44 A.D.2d 799, 355 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 799 (People v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Diaz, 44 A.D.2d 799, 355 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 9, 1973, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the ease remanded to the Criminal Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, for resentence in compliance with GPL 380.50. While ordinarily the statement made herein by the court clerk would constitute sufficient compliance with CPL 380.50 (see People v. Hyatt, 43 A D 2d 564; People v. McClain, 42 A D 2d 868), under the circumstances of this case, where an official interpreter was required, it was necessary that the defendant should have the invitation to speak on his- own behalf directed to him separately and an. answer elicited from him. The People have candidly conceded that a resentence is mandated herein for failure to [800]*800comply with CPL 380.50. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Steuer and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 9, 1973, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the ease remanded to the Criminal Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, for resentence in compliance with GPL 380.50. While ordinarily the statement made herein by the court clerk would constitute sufficient compliance with CPL 380.50 (see People v. Hyatt, 43 A D 2d 564; People v. McClain, 42 A D 2d 868), under the circumstances of this case, where an official interpreter was required, it was necessary that the defendant should have the invitation to speak on his- own behalf directed to him separately and an. answer elicited from him. The People have candidly conceded that a resentence is mandated herein for failure to [800]*800comply with CPL 380.50. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Steuer and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 799, 355 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-diaz-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack