People v. Diaz

640 N.E.2d 1134, 84 N.Y.2d 839, 616 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2325
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 8, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 640 N.E.2d 1134 (People v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Diaz, 640 N.E.2d 1134, 84 N.Y.2d 839, 616 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2325 (N.Y. 1994).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Sufficient evidence exists to support the hearing court’s determination that defendant voluntarily consented to accompany the police officers to the station on March 13, 1991, and was not in custody when he made an exculpatory statement (see, People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 588-589, cert denied 400 US 851).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Floyd
85 A.D.3d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Jean
13 A.D.3d 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Peterkin
12 A.D.3d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Spruill
2004 NY Slip Op 50396(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
640 N.E.2d 1134, 84 N.Y.2d 839, 616 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-diaz-ny-1994.