People v. Di Stefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Di Stefano

170 A.D. 600, 156 N.Y.S. 679, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6085

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1915·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This court has jurisdiction of the appeal. (People v. Fowler, 166 App. Div. 605.) The evidence was sufficient to warrant [601] the court in adjudging that it is for the welfare of the defendant that she be placed in a reformatory. (Consolidation Act [Laws of 1882, chap. 410], § 1466, subd. 1, as amd. by Laws of 1886, chap. 353; Laws of 1903, chap. 436; Laws of 1904, chap. 537, and Laws of 1914, chap. 445; Greater N". Y". Charter [Laws of 1897, chap. 378; Laws of 1901, chap. 466], §§ 1608, 1609, 1610.)

The judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, should he affirmed.

Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. .

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This court has jurisdiction of the appeal. (People v. Fowler, 166 App. Div. 605.) The evidence was sufficient to warrant [601] the court in adjudging that it is for the welfare of the defendant that she be placed in a reformatory. (Consolidation Act [Laws of 1882, chap. 410], § 1466, subd. 1, as amd. by Laws of 1886, chap. 353; Laws of 1903, chap. 436; Laws of 1904, chap. 537, and Laws of 1914, chap. 445; Greater N". Y". Charter [Laws of 1897, chap. 378; Laws of 1901, chap. 466], §§ 1608, 1609, 1610.)

The judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, should he affirmed.

Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. .

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, affirmed.

People v. Di Stefano, 170 A.D. 600, 156 N.Y.S. 679, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

170 A.D. 600 (People v. Di Stefano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related