People v. Di Stefano
This text of 170 A.D. 600 (People v. Di Stefano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court has jurisdiction of the appeal. (People v. Fowler, 166 App. Div. 605.) The evidence was sufficient to warrant [601]*601the court in adjudging that it is for the welfare of the defendant that she be placed in a reformatory. (Consolidation Act [Laws of 1882, chap. 410], § 1466, subd. 1, as amd. by Laws of 1886, chap. 353; Laws of 1903, chap. 436; Laws of 1904, chap. 537, and Laws of 1914, chap. 445; Greater N". Y". Charter [Laws of 1897, chap. 378; Laws of 1901, chap. 466], §§ 1608, 1609, 1610.)
The judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, should he affirmed.
Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. .
Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 600, 156 N.Y.S. 679, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-di-stefano-nyappdiv-1915.