People v. Di Raffaele

101 A.D.2d 866, 476 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18561

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered May 27, 1982, convicting him of [867]*867eight counts of criminal usury in the first degree and two counts of criminal usury in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. 11 Judgment affirmed. H The terms “scheme or business of making or collecting usurious loans” set forth in section 190.42 of the Penal Law are not unconstitutionally vague CPeople v Lombardo, 61 NY2d 97). Hence, defendant’s argument to the contrary is rejected. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Di Raffaele, 101 A.D.2d 866, 476 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

101 A.D.2d 866 (People v. Di Raffaele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lombardo
460 N.E.2d 1074 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)