People v. Di Raffaele

101 A.D.2d 866, 476 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18561

This text of 101 A.D.2d 866 (People v. Di Raffaele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Di Raffaele, 101 A.D.2d 866, 476 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered May 27, 1982, convicting him of [867]*867eight counts of criminal usury in the first degree and two counts of criminal usury in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. 11 Judgment affirmed. H The terms “scheme or business of making or collecting usurious loans” set forth in section 190.42 of the Penal Law are not unconstitutionally vague CPeople v Lombardo, 61 NY2d 97). Hence, defendant’s argument to the contrary is rejected. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lombardo
460 N.E.2d 1074 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 866, 476 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-di-raffaele-nyappdiv-1984.