People v. Di Lello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Di Lello

129 A.D.2d 828, 513 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 828 (People v. Di Lello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Di Lello, 129 A.D.2d 828, 513 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Coutant, J.), rendered October 19, 1984, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of arson in the third degree.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of arson in the third degree. His contention is that the prosecutor made several improper comments during summation which deprived him of a fair trial. Since no objection was taken during the summation, these contentions have not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Simmons, 121 AD2d 579). Further, review of these allegations as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice is not warranted.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Coutant, J.), rendered October 19, 1984, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of arson in the third degree.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of arson in the third degree. His contention is that the prosecutor made several improper comments during summation which deprived him of a fair trial. Since no objection was taken during the summation, these contentions have not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Simmons, 121 AD2d 579). Further, review of these allegations as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice is not warranted.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 828, 513 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-di-lello-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack