People v. Di Laura

243 N.W. 49, 259 Mich. 260, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 959
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 6, 1932
DocketDocket No. 162, Calendar No. 35,720.
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 243 N.W. 49 (People v. Di Laura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Di Laura, 243 N.W. 49, 259 Mich. 260, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 959 (Mich. 1932).

Opinion

Wiest, J.

The information charged defendants with conspiring to obtain money by false pretenses, subtle means and devices, from five named persons. Defendants were convicted and prosecute review.

Defendants operated a private bank and received money to be forwarded to Italy, and, it was claimed, converted the same to their own use. There was also a count in the information for larceny by conversion, but this was waived by the prosecution at the close of all proofs.

The court was requested to instruct the jury as to what would constitute subtle means, devices, and false pretenses, but failed to do so.

The information charged a conspiracy to defraud. This necessarily involved a combination to accom *262 plish a fraud. We find no evidence justifying the finding of a conspiracy. It appears that persons, without solicitation other than the existence of a bank, deposited money to be forwarded to Italy, and such money was not forwarded by defendants. Whether this constituted the crime of larceny by' conversion we need not determine, for such charge was withdrawn.

To constitute a conspiracy, there must exist a combination to accomplish an unlawful end, or a.lawful end by unlawful means.

The verdict was not supported by the proofs, and the convictions are reversed and new trials granted.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Fead, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Blume
505 N.W.2d 843 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1993)
People v. Anderson
340 N.W.2d 634 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Sutherlin
323 N.W.2d 456 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Samuel Smith
271 N.W.2d 252 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Atley
220 N.W.2d 465 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Erwin
120 P.2d 285 (Utah Supreme Court, 1941)
People v. McKenna
276 N.W. 718 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1937)
People v. Tenerowicz
253 N.W. 296 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 N.W. 49, 259 Mich. 260, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-di-laura-mich-1932.